Construyendo Casas, Construyendo Naciones: Implicaciones Pública y Privadas En La Formación De Los Estados Unidos

Resumen

El artículo examina la compleja interacción entre las esferas pública y privada, en particular
desde una óptica feminista, haciendo hincapié en las dimensiones políticas inherentes
a la evolución del hogar en Norteamérica. Se desafía, por tanto, la dicotomía
tradicional, ahondando en la íntima conexión entre lo público y lo privado. El hogar,
redefinido como políticamente relevante, se convierte en campo de batalla de dinámicas
de poder, responsabilidades de cuidado y construcción de estructuras sociales. La casa
colonial es retratada como un factor crucial en la colonización, sufriendo una transformación
que la convierte en el centro del "culto a la domesticidad". El artículo desvela la
naturaleza paradójica del sentimentalismo y de la ideología de las "esferas separadas",
resaltando el valor político del hogar mientras las mujeres permanecen excluidas de la
acción política directa. La discusión final hace hincapié en los esfuerzos feministas por
salvar la brecha entre la vida doméstica y la pública, reconociendo los derechos de las
mujeres en el hogar y abogando por la visibilidad y el reconocimiento político del trabajo
doméstico en el espacio público.

Palabras clave:

hogar esferas separadas domesticidad feminismo

Citas

Agnew, J. H. (1851). Woman's Offices and Influence. Harper's New Monthly Magazine,

, 17, October, 657.

Baritono, R. (2001). The sentiment of liberties: the Seneca Falls Declaration and the women's

rights debate in the mid-nineteenth century United States. La Rosa Éditrice.

Boydston, J. (1990). Home and work: housework, wages, and the ideology of labor in the

early republic. Oxford University Press.

Brunner, O. (1968). Das 'ganze Haus' und die alteuropäische 'Ökonomik'. In Id. Neue

Wege der Verfassungs-und Sozialgeschichte (pp. 103-27). Vandenhoeck u. Ruprecht.

Child, L. M. (1835). History of the Condition of Women, in Various Ages and Nations.

John Allen.

Child, L. M. (1843). Slavery's Pleasant Homes. The Liberty Bell, 4, 147-160.

Cruea, S. M. (2005). Changing ideals of womanhood during the nineteenth-century

women's movement. ATQ, 19(3), 187-204.

Degler, C. (1980). At Odds: Women and the Family from the Revolution to the Present.

Oxford University Press.

Emerson, R. W. (1971). Nature. In The Collected Works of R. W. Emerson, I, Nature.

Addresses and Lectures (pp. 3-48). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Emerson, R. W. (2008). Domestic Life. In The Collected Works of R. W. Emerson, VII,

Society and Solitude (pp. 52-69). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Fliegelman, J. (1982). Prodigals and pilgrims: The American Revolution against patriarchal

authority 1750-1800. Cambridge University Press.

Frigo, D. (1985). The father of the family. Household government and civil government

in the tradition of the 'economica' between the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

Bulzoni.

Glenn, E. N. (2015). Settler Colonialism as Structure: A Framework for Comparative

Studies of U.S. Race and Gender Formation. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1),

-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214560440

Hayden, D. (1982). The Grand Domestic Revolution. A History of Feminist Designs for

American Homes, Neighborhoods and Cities. MIT Press.

Hoxie, F. E. (2001). A Final Promise: The Campaign to Assimilate the Indians, 1880-1920.

University of Nebraska Press.

Kerber, L. K. (1980). Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary

America. University of North Carolina Press.

Kraditor, A. S. (1968). Up from the Pedestal: Selected Writings in the History of American

Feminism. Quadrangle Books.

Carlotta Cossutta  BUILDING HOUSES, BUILDING NATIONS.

PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTANGLEMENTS IN THE SHAPING OF THE UNITED STATES

Lambertini, E. (2018). Economic Ethics. In T. Williams (ed.), The Cambridge Companion

to Medieval Ethics (pp. 306-324). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.

org/10.1017/9781316711859.015

Levenstein, H. (1986). The 'servant problem' and American cookery. Revue française

d'études américaines, 27/28, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfea.1986.1226

McKeon, M. (2005). The Secret History of Domesticity: Public, Private, and the Division

of Knowledge. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mosse, G. L. (1985). Nationalism and Sexuality. Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality

in Modern Europe. Howard Fertig.

Mosse, G. L. (1996). The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity. Oxford

University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195101010.001.0001

Newfield, C. (1996). The Emerson effect: individualism and submission in America. University

of Chicago Press.

Norton, M. B. (1980). Liberty's Daughters: The Revolutionary Experience of American

Women, 1750-1800. Little, Brown.

Pateman, C. (1987). Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy. In A. Phillips

(Ed.), Feminism and Equality (pp. 103-26). Blackwell.

Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford University Press.

Phillips, A. (1992). Universal Pretensions in Political Thought. In A. Phillips and M.

Barrett (Eds.), Destabilizing Theory (pp. 10-30). Polity.

Rybczynski, W. (1986). Home: A Short History of an Idea. Penguin.

Simmons, A. (1996). American Cookery [1796]. Applewood Books.

Simmons, C. (2009). Making Marriage Modern: Women's Sexuality from the Progressive

Era to World War II. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/

001.0001

Urbinati, N. (2009). Individualismo democratico. Emerson, Dewey e la cultura politica

americana. Donzelli.

Welter, B. (1966). The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820-1860. American Quarterly, 18(2),

-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2711179

Wigley, M. (1992). Untitled: The Housing of Gender. In B. Colomina (Ed.), Sexuality

and Space (pp. 327-89). Princeton Architectural Press.

Woolf, V. (1938). Three Guineas. Hogarth Press.