Cómo citar
Palano, D. (2024). Editorial – Another State of Mind: Rethinking the State to understand the ‘Return of the State’. Soft Power, 9(18), 14. Recuperado a partir de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/6210
Licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Al enviar los artículos para su evaluación, los autores aceptan que transfieren los derechos de publicación a Soft Power. Revista Soft Power para su publicación en cualquier medio. Con el fin de aumentar su visibilidad, los documentos se envían a bases de datos y sistemas de indización, así mismo pueden ser consultados en la página web de la Revista.

Resumen

As Don Gaetano, one of the characters in Leonardo Sciascia’s novel Todo Modo, sarcastically was, many scholars of political phenomena could today be surprised by the news that the state is not dead yet. In fact, the whole of the twentieth century was marked by a series of recurring diagnoses that heralded the disappearance of the state, or at least its ‘crisis’. It re-emerged in the era of globalisation, the belief that the state was affected by an obsolescence destined to lead it to death cyclically spanned the entire twentieth century, even if, from time to time, the accents changed and the causes were seen in different phenomena.
In 1907, in the pages of Le Mouvement Socialiste, Edouard Berth —a supporter of revolutionary syndicalism and follower of the philosophy of George Sorel— emphatically greeted the death ‘of this fantastic, prodigious being who had such a colossal place in history’ — the state (quoted in Schmitt, 1972, p. 123). This diagnosis was shared by many scholars at the time. In 1908, for example, Léon Duguit wrote that ‘the personal and sovereign state is dead or is about to die’ (Duguit, 1911, p. 144). The following year, in his famous inaugural address on The Modern State and its Crisis, Santi Romano presented —albeit with different accents— a largely similar reading. After retracing the historical events that had led to the formation of the modern state, the Sicilian jurist formulated a rather gloomy diagnosis of its destiny: the state ‘which emerged from the French revolution’, wrote Romano, was ‘too simple’ (1950, p. 318), and the parliamentary system built during the 19th century, due to this genetic limit, was totally inadequate in the face of the need to guarantee the representation of new economic and social groups

Citas

Alami, I. & Dixon, A.D. (2021). Uneven and combined state capitalism. EPA: Economy

and Space, 1-28.

Alami, I. et. al (2021). Geopolitics and the ‘New’ State Capitalism. Geopolitics, 1-29.

Altvater, E. (1973b). Note on Some Problems of State Interventionism (II). Kapitalistate

(2), 76-83.

Barrow, C.W. (2005), The Return of the State: Globalization, State Theory, and the New

Imperialism. New Political Science, 27: 2, 123-145.

Barrow, C.W. (2016). Toward a Critical Theory of the State: The Poulantzas-Miliband

Debate After Globalization, Albany, New York: Suny Press.

Beck, U. (ed.) (1998). Politik der Globalisierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

Bellocchio, L. (2006). Mutamento e persistenza dello stato nazionale. Nuova Informazione

Bibliografica, 2, 295-310.

Block, F. (1980). Beyond Relative Autonomy: State Managers as Historical Subjects. The

Socialist Register, 227-242.

Bonefeld, W. & Psychopedis, K. (eds.) (2000). The Politics of Change. Globalization, Ideology

and Critique. London - New York: Palgrave.

Bonefeld, W. &, Holloway, J. (eds) (1996). Global Capital, National State and the Politics

of Money. London: MacMillan.

Bonefeld, W. (2014). Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy. New York:

Bloomsbury.

Braunmühl, C.v. et al. (1973). Probleme einer materialistischen Staatstheorie. Suhrkamp

Verlag: Frankfurt a/M.

Bremmer, I. (2010). The end of free market. Who wins the war between states and corporatons?,

London: Penguin Random House.

Clark, I. (1997). Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the Twentieth

Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Clarke, S. (1977). Marxism, Sociology and Poulantzas’ Theory of the State. Capital &

Class, 2, 1-31.

Clarke, S. (1990). Crisis of Socialism or Crisis of the State? Capital & Class, 42, 19-29.

Clarke, S., ed. (1991). The State Debate. London: Palgrave.

Cratbree, J. et al. (2020, May 16). The future of the state. foreignpolicy.com.

Crozier, M., Huntington, S. & Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy: On the Governability

of Democracies. New York: New York University – Trilateral Commission.

Davenport, A. (2011). Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist fate? European Journal of

International Relations. 1, 27–48.

Del Vecchio, G. (1933). La crisi dello Stato. Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto.

, 684-706.

Duguit, L. (1911). Le droit sociale, le droit individuel et la transformation de l’État. Paris,

Alcan.

Economist (2010, January 21). Leviathan stirs again. The growth of the state. Economist

Economist (2012, January 21). The rise of state capitalism. The Economist.

Evans, P. et al. (eds.) (1985), Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University

Press.

Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building. Governance and World Order in the 21st Century.

Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Gerbaudo, P. (2021). The great recoil: Politics after populism and pandemic. Londra: Verso

Books.

Gerbaudo, P. (2022). Controllare e proteggere. Il ritorno dello Stato, Milano: Nottetempo.

Hall, J.A. (2011). The Return of the State, Social Science Research Council (http://essays.

ssrc.org/sept11/essays/hall_text_only.htm).

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

Held, D. et al. (1999). Global Transformation. Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford:

Stanford University Press.

Hirsch, J. (1974). Staatsapparat und Reproduktion des Kapitals. Frankfurt a. M.:

Suhrkamp Verlag.

Kaldor, M. (1999). New and Old Wars. Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambdrige:

Polity Press.

Kapstein, E.B. (1994). Governing the Global Economy. International Finance and the

State. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

Keating, M. & Loughlin, J. (eds.) (1997). The Political Economy of New Regionalism.

London – Portland: Frank Class.

Keating, M. (1998). The New Regionalism in Western Europe. Territorial Restructuring

and Political Change. London – Portland: Frank Class.

Krasner, S.D. (1984), Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical

Dynamics, Comparative Politics, 2, 223-246.

Krasner, S.D. (2001). Rethinking the sovereign state model. Review of International

Studies, 17-42.

Lindblom, C.E. (1982). Another State of Mind. American Political Science Review, 1,

-21.

Mann M. (1986). The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and

Results. European Journal of Sociology. 2, 185-213.

Mann M. (1997). Has Globalization ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?, Review

of International Political Economy. 3, 472-496.

Miliband, R. (1969). The State in Capitalist Society. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

Mitchell, T. (1991). The Limits of the State: beyond statist approaches and their critics.

American Political Science Review, 1, 77-96.

Negri, A. (1977). La Forma-Stato. Per la critica dell’economia politica della costituzione.

Milano: Feltrinelli.

Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the Welfare State. Boston: Mit Press.

Ohmae, K. (1995). The End of the Nation State. The Rise of Regional Economies. New

York: The Free Press.

Panitch, L. (1996). Rethinking the Role of the State. In J.H. Mittelman (ed.). Globalization.

Critical Reflections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 83-113.

Poulantzas, N. (1968). Pouvoir politique et classes sociales de l’état capitaliste. Paris : Maspero.

Poulantzas. N. (1969). The Problem of the Capitalist State. New Left Review, 58, 67-78.

Robinson, W. (2001). Social Theory and globalization: the rise of the transnational state.

Theory and Society. 2, pp. 157-200.

Romano, S. (1950). Lo Stato moderno e la sua crisi. In Romano, S. Scritti minori. Milano:

Giuffrè, 310-325.

Rosecrance, R. (1999). Rise of the Virtual State: Wealth and Power in the Coming Century.

New York: Basic Books.

Sassen, S. (1996). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia

University Press.

Schmitt, C. (1972). Il concetto di ‘politico’. In Schmitt, C., Le categorie del ‘politico’. Saggi

di teoria politica. Bologna, Il Mulino, 87-165.

Schmitt, C. (1978). Die legale Weltrevolution. Politischer Mehrwert als Prämie auf juristischen

Legalitäten und Superlegalität. Der Staat, 3, 321-339).

Shaw, M. (2000). Theory of the Global State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strange S. (1996). The Retreat of the State. The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Streeck, W. (2014). Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London:

Verso.

Van Apeldoorn, B. & de Graaf, N. (2022). The state in global capitalism before and after

the Covid-19 crisis. Contemporary Politics. 3, 306-327.

Van Creveld, M. (1999). The rise and decline of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Weiss, L. (1998). The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Weiss, L. (ed.) (2003). States in the Global Economy. Bringing Domestic Institutions Back

In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Citado por

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |