¿Más allá del imperio?

Resumo

El artículo considera la pertinencia del concepto de imperio para la continua inteligibilidad de la configuración del orden internacional contemporáneo. La pertinencia se examina rastreando su presencia en la obra reciente de Cacciari (The Withholding Power) y la tematización más extendida en la obra de Hart y Negri. El examen parte de la cuestión del entrelazamiento del concepto de imperio con el marco de la teología política y las consecuencias de la particular inflexión que Cacciari le confiere en The Withholding Power. Las dificultades del enfoque cacciariano son entonces la base para pasar de la teología política al examen de la apropiación por parte de Hart y Negri de la politeia como interconexión entre el concepto de imperio y los elementos de una constitución mixta. A continuación, se indica que el carácter de la apropiación es la delineación preparatoria del orden internacional contemporáneo cuya transformación
—la que está más allá del imperio— surge de una globalización desde abajo compuesta por la interconexión de la multitud y lo común. Concluye con una reflexión sobre la noción de lo común.

Referências

Annequin, J. (2018). Un impérialisme romain? Regard politique, construction de

sens et écriture de l’histoire chez Polybe. Quelques remarques. Droits, 67(1), 3-14.

Balot, R. (2010). Polybius’ Advice to the Imperial Republic. Political Theory, 38(4),

-509

Bazzicalupo, L. (2019). La dimensione politica delle teorie critiche del diritto. Materiali

per una storia della cultura giuridica, 49(2), 317-332.

Bazzicalupo, L. (2016a). Governamentalità: una ri-definizione operativa della razionalità

politica. Parolechiave, 24(2), 89-102.

Bazzicalupo, L. (2016b). Economy as Logic of Government. Paragraph, 39(1), 36-48.

Cacciari, M. (2016). Europe and Empire. On the Political Forms of Globalization. New

York: Fordham University Press.

Cacciari, M. & Prodi, P. (2016). Occidente senza utopie. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Cacciari, M. (2018). The Witholding Power. An Essay on Political Theology. London:

Bloomsbury.

de Soto, H. (2001). The Mystery of Capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails

everywhere else. London: Black Swan.

de Soto, H. (2002). The Other Path: The Economic Answer to Terrorism. New York: Basic

Books.

de Soto, H. & Cheneval, F. (Eds.). (2006). Realizing Property Rights. Zurich: Rüffer &

Rub.

Erskine. A. (2013). How to Rule the World: Polybius Book 6 Reconsidered. In B. Gibson

and T. Harrison (Eds.), Polybius & His World (pp. 231-246). Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Fischer-Lescano, A. & Möller, K. (2016). The Struggle for Transnational Social Rights.

In A. Fischer-Lescano and K. Möller (Eds.) Transnationalisation of social rights (pp.

-47), Cambridge: Intersentia.

Fitzpatrick, P. (2004). The Immanence of Empire. In P. A. Passavant & J. Dean (Eds.),

Empire’s New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri (pp. 31-56). London: Routledge.

Fukuyama, F. (1993). The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin.

Fukuyama, F. (2006). After The Neocons: America at the Crossroads.

Fukuyama, F. (2011). What Crisis. In Birdsall, N. & Fukuyama F. (Eds.), New Ideas on

Development after the Financial Crisis (pp. 312-327). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University

Press.

Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution

to the Globalisation of Democracy. London: Profile Books.

Galli, C. (2016). La Forme Della Critica. Epoca, Contingenza, Emergenza. Filosofia Politica,

(3), 385-418.

Guelfucci, M.-R. (2003). Pouvoir politique et crise de société chez Polybe. In V. Fromentin,

J.-M. Roddaz, S. Gotteland & S. Franchet d’Espèrey (Eds.), Fondements et Crises

du Pouvoir (pp. 271-280). Bordeaux: Ausonius.

Guelfucci, M.-R. (2006). Polybe et Montesquieu: aspects d’une réflexion sur le pouvoir.

Anabases, (4), 125-139.

Guelfucci, M.-R. (2008). Anciens et Modernes: Machiavel et la lecture polybienne de

l’histoire. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne, 34(1), 85-104.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London/

New York: Penguin Books.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

Press.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2018a). The Powers of the Exploited and the Social Ontology of

Praxis. tripleC, 16(2), 415-423.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2018b). The Multiplicities within Capitalist Rule and the Articulation

of Struggles. tripleC, 16(2), 440-448.

Hardt, & Negri, A. (2019). Empire, Twenty Years On. New Left Review, (120), 67-92.

Hartog, F. (2010). Polybius and the First Universal History. In P. Liddle & A. Fear (Eds.),

Historiae Mundi: Studies in University History (pp. 30-40). London: Bloomsbury.

Lefort, C. (2006). The Permanence of the Theologico-Political? In H. de Vries and L.E.

Sullivan (Eds.) Political Theologies. Public Religions in a Post-Secular World (pp. 148-

, New York: Fordham University Press.

Lohmann, G. (2016). Normative Perspectives on Transnational Social Rights. In A.

Fischer.

Lescano and K. Möller (Eds.) Transnationalisation of social rights (pp. 49-66), Cambridge:

Intersentia.

Lordon, F. (2018). La Condition Anarchique: Affects et institutions de la valeur. Paris: Les

Editions du Seuil.

Lordon, F. (2015). Imperium: Structures et affects de corps politiques. Paris: La Fabrique

Editions.

Macherey, P. (2004). Présentation par P. Macherey de Michael Hardt/ Antonio Negri,

Multitude, guerre et démocratie à l’âge de l’Empire.

Marramao, G. (Ed.). (2020). Interregnum. Between Biopolitics and Hegemony. Sesto San

Giovanni: Mimesis International.

Möller, K. (2018). From constituent to destituent power beyond the state. Transnational

Legal Theory, 9(1), 32-55.

Möller, K. (2016). A Critical Theory of Transnational Regimes: Creeping Managerialism

and the Quest for a Destituent Power. In K. Blome et al. (Eds.), Contested Regime

Collisions. Norm Fragmentation in World Society (pp. 255-280). Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Möller, K. (2011). Struggles for Law: Global Social Rights as an Alternative to Financial

Market Capitalism. In Febbrajo et al. (Eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional

Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation (pp. 305-332). Oxford: Hart.

Negri, A. (2005a). Réponse À Pierre Macherey. Multitudes, 22(3), 111-117.

Negri, A. (2005b). Postmodern Global Governance and the Critical Legal Project. Law

& Critique, 16(1), 27-46.

Negri, A. (2008). Philosophy of Law Against Sovereignty: New Excesses, Old Fragmentations.

Law & Critique, 19(3), 335–343.

Negri, A. (2010). The Law of the Common. Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 21,

-25.

Nelsestuen, G.A. (2017). Custom, fear and self-interest in the political thought of Polybius.

History of Political Thought, 38(2), 213-238.

Preterossi, G. (2019). Senza freni. La de-costituzionalizzazione neoliberale. Teoria politica,

(9), 31-55.

Preterossi, G. (2017). Radicalità. Filosofia politica, (1), 69-80.

Schmit, C. (2010). Political Theology II. The Myth of the Closure of Any Political Theology.

Cambridge: Polity.

Smith, B. (2007). The Foundations of Social Coordination: John Searle and Hernando

de Soto. In N. Psarros, K. Schulte-Ostermann (Eds.), Facets of Sociality (pp. 3-22).

Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag.

Spanò, M. (2019). Making the Multiple: Toward a Trans-Subjective Private Law. The

South Atlantic Quarterly, 118(4), 839-855.

B. Smith, D. Mark & I. Ehrlich (Eds.). (2008). The Mystery of Capital and the Construction

of Social Reality. Chicago: Open Court.

Stiegler, B. (2019). “Il faut s’adapter”. Sur un nouvel impératif politique. Paris: Gallimard.

Straumann, B. (2020). Leaving the State of Nature: Polybius on Resentment and the

Emergence of Morals and Political Order. Polis, 37(1), 9-43.

Supiot, A. (2016). What international social justice in the twenty-first century? Opening

address of the XXIst World Congress of the International Society for Labour

and Social Security Law (ISLSSL), Cap Town (South Africa) 15-18 september 2015.

Labour law and social progress: holding the line or shifting the boundaries? Bulletin for

Comparative Labour Relations, 92, 1-18.

Teubner, G. (2004a). Global private regimes: Neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution

of autonomous sectors in world society? In K.-H. Ladeur (Ed.), Public Governance

in the Age of Globalization (pp. 71-88). London: Routledge.

Teubner, G. (2004b). Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centered Constitutional

Theory? In C. Joerges, I.-J. Sand & G. Teubner (Eds.), Constitutionalism And

Transnational Governance (pp. 3-28). Oxford: Hart.

Peter Langford  BEYOND EMPIRE

Teubner, G. (2010a). Fragmented Foundations: Societal Constitutionalism Beyond the

Nation State. In P. Dobner & M. Loughlin (Eds.) The Twilight of Constitutionalism?

(pp. 327-342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Teubner, G. (2010b). Societal Constitutionalism and the Politics of the Common. Finnish

Yearbook of International Law, 21, 2-15.

Teubner, G. (2012). Constitutional Fragments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Teubner, G. (2013a). The Project of Constitutional Sociology: Irritating Nation State

Constitutionalism. Transnational Legal Theory, 4(1), 44-58.

Teubner, G. & Beckers, A. (2013b). Expanding Constitutionalism. Indiana Journal of

Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 523-550.

Teubner, G. (2018). Quod omnes tangit: Transnational Constitutions Without Democracy?

Journal Of Law And Society, 45(1), 5-29. The Report of the Commission on Legal

Empowerment of the Poor - Making the Law Work for everyone: Vol 1 (2009) Retrieved

from <https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/document/making-the-law-work-for-everyone-

vol-1-report-of-the-commission-on-legal-empowerment-of-the-poor