
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Al enviar los artículos para su evaluación, los autores aceptan que transfieren los derechos de publicación a Soft Power. Revista Soft Power para su publicación en cualquier medio. Con el fin de aumentar su visibilidad, los documentos se envían a bases de datos y sistemas de indización, así mismo pueden ser consultados en la página web de la Revista.Resumo
The application of big data in agriculture offers a promising opportunity for the sustainable transformation of the global agricultural sector. However, it also raises legal challenges that risk exacerbating the so-called “big data divide” between farmers and agribusinesses, as well as amplifying the “lock-in” problem for the former. In the context of rethinking traditional governance tools for data protection, which are currently crystallized around the dichotomy between personal and non-personal data, they fail to address the unique characteristics of agricultural data. In this context, a comparative legal analysis of the EU and US frameworks proves valuable for identifying converging trends in addressing this paradigm shift.
Referências
rd United States Congress. (1914). Federal Trade Commission Act. https://www.ftc.gov/ legal-library/browse/statutes/federal-trade-commission-act
th United States Congress. (1996). Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act. https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3103
th United States Congress. (1999). Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. https://www.congress. gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-bill/900
th United States Congress. (2016). Defend Trade Secrets Act. https://www.congress. gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1890
American Farm Bureau. (2014). Privacy and Security Principles for Farm Data. https:// www.basicknowledge101.com/pdf/PrivacyAndSecurityPrinciplesForFarmData.pdf
Atik, C. (2022). Towards Comprehensive European Agricultural Data Governance: Moving Beyond the “Data Ownership” Debate. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 53, 701–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01191-w
Atik, C. (2023a). Addressing Data Access Problems in the Emerging Digital Agriculture Sector: Potential of the Refusal to Deal Case Law to Complement ex-ante Regulation. European Competition Journal, 19(3), 380–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2023.2200618
Atik, C. (2023b). Horizontal Intervention, Sectoral Challenges: Evaluating the Data Act’s Impact on Agricultural Data Access Puzzle in the Emerging Digital Agriculture Sector. Computer Law & Security Review, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105861
Atik, C., & Martens, B. (2020). Competition Problems and Governance of Non-personal Agriculture Machine Data: Comparing Voluntary Initiatives in the US and EU. JRC Digital Economy Working Paper, 7. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3766293 Baloup, J., Bayamioglu, E., Benmayor, A., Ducuing, C., Dutkiewicz, L., Lalova, T., Miadzvetskaya,
Y., & Peeters, B. (2021). White Paper on the Data Governance Act. KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law- imec. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3872703
Barrio Andrés, M. (2022). La regulación del derecho o la protección de datos en los Estados Unidos: hacia un RGPD norteamericano. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 14(2), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.7181
Béguin-Faynel, C. (2020). La problématique de l’appropriation des données agricoles. Revue de droit rural, 479, colloque 2. Bergé, J.-S., Grumbach, S., & Zeno-Zencovich, V. (2018). The ‘Datasphere’, Data Flows beyond Control, and the Challenges for Law and Governance? European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 4, 144–178. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00502001
California State Assembly. (2018). The California Consumer Privacy Act. https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa
California State Assembly. (2020). California Privacy Rights Act. https://thecpra.org/
Calzolaio, E. (2023). Beni digitali e proprietà tra civil law e common law. Rivista Critica del Diritto Privato, 3, 287–326.
Calzolaio, E. (2024). From data property to data access and back again? Comparative remarks on the EU Data Act. lacittadinanzaeuropeaonline, 1, 43–52.
Carbonell, I. M. (2016)., The Ethics of Big Data in Big Agriculture. Internet Policy Review. Journal on Internet Regulation, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.405
Di Lella, A. L. (2023). Accept All Cookies: Opting-in to a Comprehensive Federal Privacy Framework and Opting-Out of a Disparate State Regulatory Regime. Villanova Law Review, 68(3), 511–551. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol68/iss3/4
Di Porto, F., & Zuppetta, M. (2023). Co-regulating Algorithm Disclosure for Digital Platforms. In G. Resta & V. Zeno-Zencovich (Eds.), Governance of/through Big Data(pp. 540–564). RomaTrePress.
Drexl, J. (2018). Connected Devices: An Unfair Competition Law Approach to DataAccess Rights of Users, Consumer Protection. In German Federal Ministry of Justiceand Consumer Protection & Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition(Eds.), Data Access, Consumer Interests and Public Welfare (pp. 477–527). Nomos.https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748924999-477
Ducuing, C. (2024). The Regulation of Data in the European Union: The Data Governance Act and the Data Act. In E. Akin, S. Klimbacher, & G. Ziccardi (Eds.), Smart Cities, ArtificialIntelligence and Digital Transformation Law (pp. 63–90). Milano University Press.
European Commission. (2018). EU Code of Conduct on Agricultural Data Sharing by Contractual Agreement. https://fefac.eu/wp content/uploads/2020/07/eu_code_of_ conduct_on_agricultural_data_sharing-1.pdf
European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. Communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. https://eur-lex.europa. eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=legissum:4438420
European Commission. (2021). 2030 Digital Compass: the European way for the Digital Decade. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council,the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.https://eufordigital.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2030-Digital-Compass-the-European-way-for-the-Digital-Decade.pdf
European Commission. (2024). AgriDataSpace Policy Brief. Building a European Framework for the Secure and Trusted Data Space for Agriculture. https://agridataspace-csa. eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/AGRIDATA-SPACE-FINAL-BROCHURE.pdf
European Court of Auditors. (2022). Data in the Common Agricultural Policy – Unrealized potential of big data for policy evaluations. https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR22_16
European Parliament & EU Counsel. (1996). Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Counsel l of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases.https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1996/9/oj/eng
European Parliament & EU Counsel. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Counsel of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng
European Parliament & EU Counsel. (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Counsel of 14 November 2018 on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1807/oj/eng
European Parliament & EU Counsel. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/868 of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on European data governance and amending
Regulation (EU) 2018/1724. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/868/oj/eng
European Parliament & EU Counsel. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2023 on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 (Data Act) (Text with EEA relevance). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:32023R2854&qid=1737192951114&rid=1
Fédération Nationale des Syndicats d’Exploitants Agricoles. (2018). Charte sur l’utilisation des données agricoles. Valoriser et sécuriser les données des exploitations agricoles dans les cont. https://www.data-agri.fr/Asset/Charte_Data-Agri-Utilisation%20 des%20donn%C3%A9es%20agricoles.pdf
Ferris, J. L. (2017). Data Privacy and Protection in the Agriculture Industry: Is Federal Regulation Necessary? Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 18(1), 309–342.
García, R., & Gil, R. (2024). Agriculture Data Space for Sovereign Data Sharing and Semantic Integration. https://semantic.internationaldataspaces.org/wp-content/ uploads/2024/08/Agriculture-Data-Space-for-Sovereign-Data-Sharing-and-Semantic- Integration.pdf
Goldman, E. (2021). An Introduction to California’s Consumer Privacy Law (CCPA and CPRA). Internet Law: Cases & Materials. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3896176
Graef, I., Gellert, R., & Husovec, M. (2018). Towards a Holistic Regulatory Approach for the European Data Economy: Why the Illusive Notion of Non-Personal Data is Counterproductive to Data Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3256189
Hackfort, S. (2023). Unlocking Sustainability? The Power of Corporate Lock-ins and How They Shape Digital Agriculture in Germany. Journal of Rural Studies, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103065
Hansen Krause, H., & Porter, T. (2017). What do Big Data do in Global Governance? Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organisations, 23(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02301004
Janzen, T. J. (2019). Legal Aspects Related to Agricultural Data Collection, Storage and Use. Western Diary Management Conference. http://wdmc.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2019/05/Janzen-Todd.pdf
Jolly, I. (2016). US Privacy and Data Security Law: Overview. Thomson Reuters. https:// uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/6-501-4555?transitionType=Default&context Data=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true
King, J., & Richards, N. M. (2013). Three Paradoxes of Big Data. Stanford Law Review Online. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-and-big-data-three-paradoxes- of-big-data/
Kosior, K. (2021). Towards a Common Agricultural Data Space in the European Union: A Sustainable Development Perspective. Wieś i Rolnictwo, 2(191), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.53098/wir022021/03
Las Casas, A. (2024). Capitalismo dell’informazione e circolazione della ricchezza. Modelli giuridici statunitensi. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
Mantelero, A. (2012). Big Data: i rischi della concentrazione del potere informativo digitale e gli strumenti di controllo. Diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica, 1, 135–144.
Mezzanotte, F. (2017). Access to Data: The Role of Consent and the Licensing Scheme. In R. S. S. Lohsse (Ed.), Trading Data in the Digital Economy: Legal Concepts and Tools (pp. 159–187). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845288185-159
Resta, G. (2023). Towards a unified regime of data-rights? In G. Resta & V. Zeno-Zencovich (Eds), Governance of/through Big Data (pp. 643 659). RomaTrePress.
Ruohonen, J., & Mickelsson, S. (2023). Reflections on the Data Governance Act. Digital Society, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-000417
Ryan, M. (2020). Agricultural Big Data Analytics and the Ethics of Power. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 33, 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09812-0
Ryan, M., Atik, C., Rijswij, K., Bogaardt, M.-J., Maes, E., & Deroo, E. (2024). The future of agricultural data-sharing policy in Europe: stakeholder insights on the EU Code of Conduct. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03710-1
Sadowski, J. (2019). When Data is Capital: Datification, Accumulation and Extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
Sanderson, J., Wisemen, L., & Poncini, S. (2018). What’s behind the Ag-Data Logo? An Examination of Voluntary Agricultural Data Codes of Practice. International Journal of Rural Law and Policy, 1. https://doi.org/10.5130/ijrlp.1.2018.6043
Sganga, C. (2022). Ventisei ani di Direttiva Database alla prova della nuova Strategia Europea per i Dati: evoluzioni giurisprudenziali e percorsi di riforma. Il diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica, 3, 651–704.
Sykuta, M. E. (2016). Big Data in Agriculture: Property Rights, Privacy and Competition in Ag Data Services. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 19(A), 57–74.
Tomasso, L. (2022). L’encadrement juridique des données dans l’environnement numérique agricole. Université de Montpellier.
Tomasso, L. (2024). La maîtrise des données agricoles: entre consentement et autorisation. Revue de droit rural, 3, dossier 14.
Uniform Law Commission. (1985). Uniform Trade Secrets Act. https://www.uniformlaws. org/committees/community-home?CommunityKey=3a2538fb-e030-4e2d-a9e 2-90373dc05792
Van Der Burg, S., Wisemen, L., & Krkeljia, J. (2021). Trust in farm data sharing: reflections on the EU code of conduct for agricultural data sharing. Ethics and Information Technology, 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09543-1
Van Erp, S. (2017). Ownership of Data and the Numerus Clausus of Legal Objects. Maastricht European Private Law Institute Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3046402
Zeno-Zencovich, V. (2018). Through a Lawyer’s Eyes: Data Visualization and Legal Epistemology. In E. Degrave, C. De Terwangne, S. Dusollier, & R. Queck (Eds.), Law, Norms and Freedoms in Cyberspace. Liber Amicorum Yves Poullet (pp. 459–470). Larcier.
Zeno-Zencovich, V., & Giannone Codiglione, G. (2016). Ten Legal Perspectives on the “Big Data Revolution”. In F. Di Porto (Ed.), Big Data e Concorrenza (pp. 29–58). Giuffré.