Brief Reflections on authoritarian Neoliberalism

Resumen

If, as is true, one of the thorniest issues within the debate on neoliberalism is the role played by law and the state, then the book by Orsetta Giolo (2020) is to be favourably welcomed as it represents a useful contribution to the construction of a clearer framework on this problem that has indefinite boundaries.
Among the numerous opportunities for reflection offered by the text, it is certainly worth dwelling on the phenomenon that Giolo (2020) appropriately defines neoliberal binarism, that is, the reticular and authoritarian character of neoliberal law, corresponding to two different legal environments inhabited by different subjects: the first one is represented by governance and the metaphor of the network, aimed at promoting freedom and optimizing competition; the second one is represented by penal state, aimed at the annihilation of political agency and the exclusion of subjects that are not adjusted to neoliberal standards (p. 24).

Citas

Bazzicalupo, L. (2020). Paradossi della responsabilità di governare, tra autorità e legittimazione

tecnica. Etica & Politica, 22(2), 189-202.

Bisogni, G. (2005). Weimar e l’unità politica e giuridica dello Stato. Saggio su Rudolf

Smend, Hermann Heller, Carl Schmitt. Napoli: ESI.

Bonefeld, W. (2017). The Strong State and the Free Economy. London: Rowman & Littlefield

International.

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Contre-feux. Propos pour server à la résistance contre l’invasion néolibérale.

Paris: Raison d’agir.

Brindisi, G. (2020). Neoliberalismo autoritario, Stato democratico di diritto e populismo

regressivo. La costruzione dell’ordine sociale attraverso il pericolo. Rassegna di

diritto pubblico europeo, (1), 17-45.

Brown, W. (2010). “We Are All Democrats Now…”. In Democracy in What State? New

York: Columbia University Press, 44-57.

Brown, W. (2019). In the Ruins of Neoliberalism. The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in

West. New York: Columbia University Press.

Chamayou, G. (2018). La société ingouvernable. Une généalogie du liberalism autoritaire.

Paris: La fabrique éditions.

Crozier, M.J., Huntington, S.P., Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. Report on

the Governability on Democracies to the trilateral Commission. New York: New York

University Press.

Dardot, P., Laval, Ch. (2019). Anatomie du nouveau néolibéralisme. Contretemps, (46).

De Fiores, C. (2020). Unione europea e legittimazione politica. Un ordinamento “irresponsabile”.

Etica e politica, 22(2), 361-378.

De Carolis, M. (2017). Il rovescio della libertà. Tramonto del neoliberalismo e disagio

della civiltà. Macerata: Quodlibet.

Dogliani, M. (1994). Introduzione al diritto costituzionale. Bologna: il Mulino.

Dogliani, M. (2004). Le masse abbandonate. Nuvole, (24), 1-4.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison (1975). English translation

by A. Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-

Ed. by M. Senellart, English edition by A.I. Davidson, English translation by G.

Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Galli, C. (2019). Carl Schmitt: politica ed economia nella crisi di Weimar. Filosofia politica,

(1), 45-54.

Giolo, O. (2020). Il diritto neoliberale. Napoli: Jovene.

Hall, S. et al. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. Honk

Hong: Macmillan Press.

Heller, H. (2015). Authoritarian Liberalism? (1933). European Law Journal, 21(3), 295-

Laclau, E. (2005). La razón populista. Buenos Aires: Fondo de cultura Económica.

Laval, Ch. (2017). Foucault et Bourdieu : à chacun son néolibéralisme?. Cartografie sociali.

Rivista di sociologia e scienze umane, (4), 231-244.

Laval, Ch. (2018). Foucault, Bourdieu et la question néolibérale. Paris: La découverte.

Mouffe, C. (2018). For a Left Populism. New York: Verso.

Neumann, F.L. (1957a). Economics and Politics in the Twentieth Century (1951). In F.L.

Neumann, The Democratic and the Authoritarian State: Essays in Political and Legal

Theory (pp. 199-228). New York: Free Press.

Neumann, F.L. (1957b). Anxiety and Politics (1954). In F.L. Neumann, The Democratic

and the Authoritarian State: Essays in Political and Legal Theory (pp. 270-295). New

York: Free Press.

Neumann, F.L. (2009). Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933-

(1942). Chicago: Ivan R. Dee and United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Pomarici, U. (2017). Postfazione. In H. Heller (ed.), Stato di diritto o dittatura? E altri

scritti (1928-1933). Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.

Poulantzas, N. (1978). L’État, le Pouvoir, le Socialisme. Paris: PUF.

Preterossi, G. (2015). Ciò che resta della democrazia. Laterza: Roma-Bari.

Schmitt, C. (1998). Strong State and Sound Economy (1932). In Appendix to R. Cristi,

Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism (pp. 212-32). Cardiff: University of Wales

Press.

Somek, A. (2003). Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Austrian Constitutional Doctrine

to 1938 and Its Legacy. In Ch. Joerges, N. Singh Ghaleigh (Eds.), Darker Legacies

of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and

its Legal Traditions (pp. 361-388). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Somma, A. (2018). Sovranismi. Stato, popolo e conflitto sociale. Roma: DeriveApprodi.

Streeck, W. (2015). Heller, Schmitt and the Euro. European Law Journal, 21(3), 361-370.

Tarizzo, D. (2020). «Ubi est fiscus, ibi est imperium». Sovranità, democrazia, Europa.

Filosofia politica, (2), 269-286.

Tucci, A. (2015). Le droit entre répression et «productivité». In J.-F. Kervégan, M. Plouviez,

P.-Y. Quivigier (Éds.), Norme et violence (pp. 115-127). Zurich-New York: Olms