Abstract
The rapid evolution of Assisted Reproduction Techniques (ART) in a few years is generating a multitude of ethical and legal problems that do not give time to resolve. Also, the use of some of these techniques, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), has caused the accumulation of millions of surplus embryos, which remains frozen in the Assisted Reproduction Clinics distributed throughout the world. It seems compulsory, from the point of view of practical reason, to analyze the justice of some decisions of the ECHR on assisted reproduction, in which the right to life of frozen embryos, as potential future persons, unable of defending their rights by themselves, and whose vulnerability is even greater than that of the nasciturus, comes into collision with other values, ideas or rights, and attending, both to the arguments used by the majority and dissenting votes, and to those handled by the main working groups of the EU in this matter.
Keywords:
References
Arnold R. (2015). Human dignity as the keystone of the protection of rights. Special Workshop: Racial justice, emotions and courts’ legal reasoning, Proceedings of the XXVII World Congress of the International Association for The Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Washington, DC.
Gafo, J. (1986). Nuevas técnicas de reproducción humana. Madrid: Publicaciones de la Universidad Pontificia Comillas.
Gumucio Schönthaler, J. C. (1997). Procreación asistida. Un análisis a la luz de la legislación chilena. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Jurídica ConoSur.
Junquera De Estéfani, R. (1998). Reproducción Asistida, Filosofía Etica y Filosofía Jurídica. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
Novales Alquézar, A. (2017). El interés superior del niño y la reproducción asistida. El artículo 2 del convenio en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. En S. Sanz Caballero & Molina Navarro, M. (Dir.), El interés superior del niño en la Jurisprudencia Internacional, Comparada y Española (pp. 309-327). Cizur Menor (Navarra): Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.