Why bother with the infrapolitical? : a question of (just) existence.

Abstract

The infrapolitical is the thinking that flickers on the tremorous limit at which the end of the representation of historical progress is finally realized and the metaphysical indulgences of previous vital, political and ideological illusions (such as the bourgeois foundations of fraternity, equality, and liberty) founder and run aground, rising up, nevertheless, in increasingly vitriolic forms as subjectivist reactionary demands for definitive (nationalist, populist, or identitarian) decisions, resolutions, or truths regarding the twilight of the modern. Attunement to a specifically infrapolitical register in thinking gives no credence to the overcoming of political disenchantment in the name of fidelity to the unifying inheritance of ‘the commons’ since the infrapolitical comes to the fore in the realization (which cannot be merely confused with eschatology) that “nothing remains any longer in which the hitherto accustomed world of humankind could be salvaged; nothing of what has gone before offers itself as something that could still be erected as a goal for the accustomed self-securing of human beings” (Heidegger, 2015, p. 154).

References

Bennington, G. (2016). Scatter 1: The Politics of Politics in Foucault, Heidegger and Derrida. New York: Fordham UP.

Cabezas, O. (2013). Postsoberanía: Literatura, política y trabajo. Lanús: Ediciones La Cebra.

Galli, C. (2010). Political Spaces and Global War. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited and Translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Heidegger, M. (1998). Letter on Humanism. In W. McNeill (Ed) Pathmarks (pp. 239-76). Cambridge: Cambridge UP:

Heidegger, M., (2015). Koivóv: Out of the History of Beyng. In The History of Beyng (pp.149-67). Translated by William McNeill and Jeffrey Powell. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hobbes, T. (1985). Leviathan. Edited by C.B. Macpherson. London: Penguin Classics.

Klein, M. C. (2018, September 14th). “Why the Euro Won’t Replace the Dollar”. Barron’s. https://www.barrons.com/articles/why-the-euro-wont-replace-the-dollar-1536945404.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Volume One. Introduced by Ernest Mandel. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin Books.

Moreiras, A. (1999). Tercer espacio: Literatura y duelo en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: LOM Editores.

Moreiras, A. (2001). The Exhaustion of Difference: The Politics of Latin American Cultural Studies. Durham: Duke UP.

Moreiras, A. (2008). Línea de sombra: El no sujeto de lo político. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Palinodia.

Moreiras, A. (2016). Marranismo e inscripción, o el abandono de la conciencia desdichada. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo Editores.

Nancy, J-L. (1993). “The Decision of Existence”. In Birth to Presence (pp. 82-109). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

Nancy, J-L. (2007). The Creation of the World or Globalization. Albany: SUNY Press.

Schürmann, R. (2003). Broken Hegemonies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Sloterdijk, P. (2017). The Domestication of Being. In Not Saved: Essays after Heidegger (pp. 89-148). Malden: Polity Press.

Sloterdijk, P. (2017). Rules for the Human Park: A Response to Heidegger’s ‘Letter on Humanism’. In Not Saved: Essays after Heidegger (pp. 193-216). Malden: Polity Press.

Villalobos-Ruminott, S. (2014). Soberanías en suspenso: Imaginación y violencia en América Latina. Lanús: Ediciones La Cebra.