Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Al enviar los artículos para su evaluación, los autores aceptan que transfieren los derechos de publicación a Soft Power. Revista Soft Power para su publicación en cualquier medio. Con el fin de aumentar su visibilidad, los documentos se envían a bases de datos y sistemas de indización, así mismo pueden ser consultados en la página web de la Revista.Resumo
El rápido crecimiento del debate en torno a las transformaciones cruciales que está teniendo nuestra economía a través del desarrollo y la difusión pública de las tecnologías digitales parece tener una consecuencia: la confusa multiplicación de palabras y conceptos sobre trabajo y la consiguiente dificultad para formular definiciones unívocas. Así, tal ambigüedad impide a menudo centrarse en el alcance real que el impacto de las tecnologías digitales está teniendo en nuestra sociedad. Si bien en su etapa inicial su potencial para remodelar la organización de la prestación de servicios atrajo comentarios optimistas de académicos y comentaristas, especialmente después de que los trabajadores comenzaron a organizarse y luchar, posteriormente surgió una floreciente literatura crítica.
Referências
Andreassen, T. W., Lervik-Olsen, L., Snyder, H., Van Riel, A. C., Sweeney, J. C., & Van
Vaerenbergh, Y. (2018). Business model innovation and value-creation: the triadic
way. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 883-906.
Arvidsson, A., & Colleoni, E. (2012). Value in informational capitalism and on the internet. Information Society, 28(3), 135-150.
Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1995, September 1). Toe Californian ideology. Mute
Magazine. Retrieved from http:/ /www.metamute.org/ editorial/ articles/ californian-ideology.
Barzilay, A.R., & Ben-David, A. (2017). Platform inequality: Gender in the gig-economy. Seton Hall Law Review, 47(393), 393-431.
Bauwens, M. (2005). Toe political economy of peer production. Post-Autistic Economics Review, 37, 33-44.
Belk, R. (2007). Why not share rather than own? Toe Annals of the American Academy
of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126-140.
Benkler, Y. (2004). Sharing nicely: on sharable goods and the emergence of sharing as a
modality of economic production. Toe Yale Law Journal, 114(2), 273-358.
Bertram, E. (2016). Toe Political Development of Contingent Work in the United States:
Independent contractors from the Coal Mines to the Gig Economy. E-Journal of
International and Comparative Labour Studies, 5(3), 1-34.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
Bratton, B. (2015). Toe stack: On software and sovereignity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bruni, A., & Esposito, F. M. (2019). It Obliges You to Do Things You Normally Wouldn't:
Organizing and Consuming Private Life in the Age of Airbnb. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 12(3), 665-690.
Casilli, A. (2019). En attendant les robots - Enquete sur le travail du clic. Paris: Le Seuil.
Crouch, C. (2019). Will the gig economy prevail? Oxford: Polity Press
De Nicola, A. (2019). 11 Platform Capitalism di fronte all'Economia Informale. Sociologia del Lavoro, 154, 79-95.
De Stefano, V. (2015). Toe rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy
Journal, 37(3), 471-504.
Domingos, P. (2015). Toe Master Algorithm. How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning
Machine Will Remake Our World. London: Penguin.
Dunn, M. (2017). Digital Work: New Opportunities or Lost Wages? American Journal
of Management, 17(4), 10-27.
Flanagan, F. (2019). Theorising the gig economy and home-based service work. Journal
oflndustrial Relations, 61(1), 57-78.
Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of
the gig economy. Review ofKeynesian Economics, 2(2), 171-188.
Fuchs, C. (2016). Digital Labor and Imperialism. Monthly Review, 67(8), 14-24.
Gillespie, T. (2010). Toe politics of platforms. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364.
Gold, L. (2004). Toe sharing economy: Solidarity networks transforming globalisation.
Aldershot: Gower Publishing.
Graham, M., Hjorth, l., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods.
European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135-162.
Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the global digital economy: Toe Cybertariat comes of age.
New York: Monthly Review Press.
Huws, U. (2017). Where did online platforms come from? Toe virtualization of work
organization and the new policy challenges it raises. In P. Meil & V. Kirov (Eds.),
Policy implications of virtual work (pp. 29-48). New York: Springer.
Huws, U., Spencer, N., Srydal, D., & Holts, K. (2018). Work in the European gig economy: Research results from the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands,
Switzerland and Italy. Hatfield: University of Herdfoshire - UNI Europa - Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
Huws, U. (2019). Labour in Contemporary Capitalism. What Next? Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Johnston, H., & Land-Kazlauskas, C. (2018). Organizing on-demand: Representation,
voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy. ILO. Conditions of work and
employment series, 94.
Loffier, M., & Tschiesner, A. (2013, June). Toe Internet ofThings and the future of manufacturing. Retrieved from: https:/ /www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/ digital-mckinsey/ our-insights/the-internet-of-things-and-the-future-of-manufacturing
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016). Independent work: choice, necessity, and the gig economy. Retrieved from McKinsey Global Institute website: https:/ /www.mckinsey.com/ ~ /media/McKinsey/Featured %20
Insights/Employment%20and%20Growth/Independent%20work%20Choice%20
necessity%20and %20the%20gig%20economy/Independent-Work-Choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economy-Executive-Summary.ashx
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and
threatens democracy. Washington: Crown Book.
Pais, I., & Provasi, G. (2015). Sharing economy: A step towards the re-embeddedness of
the economy? Stato e mercato, 35(3), 347-378.
Parker, G., Marshall Van Alstyne, W. & Sangeet P. C. (2017). Platform Revolution: How
Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work
for You. New York: Norton & Company.
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2016). Infrastructure studies
meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society,
(1), 293-310.
Popescu, G. H., Petrescu, I., & Sabie, O.M. (2018). Algorithmic labor in the platform
economy: Digital infrastructures, job quality, and workplace surveillance. Economics, Management, and Financia! Markets, 13(3), 74-79.
Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: Toe promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ravenelle, A. (2018). Hustle and gig: struggling and surviving in the sharing economy.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries:
A case study of Uber's drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758-
Sargeant, M. (2017). Toe gig economy and the future of work. E-Journal oflnternational
and Comparative Labour Studies, 6(2), 1-12.
Schiller, D. (2000). Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. Boston:
MIT Press.
Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism. Challenging the corporate sharing economy.
New York: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital
economy. Oxford: Polity Press.
Schor, J. (2016). Debating sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4(3), 7-22.
Schor, J. B., & Attwood-Charles, W (2017). Toe "sharing" economy: labor, inequality,
and social connection on for-profit platforms. Sociology Compass, 11 (8).
Schuckert, M., Peters, M., & Pilz, G. (2018). Toe co-creation ofhost-guest relationships
via couchsurfing: a qualitative study. Tourism Recreation Research, 43(2), 220-234.
Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. London: Polity Press.
Stanford, J. (2017). Toe resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives.
Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 382-401.
Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the
options? Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420-437.
Sundarajan, A. (2016). Toe sharing economy: Toe end of employment and the rise of
crowd-based capitalism. Boston: MIT Press.
van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of
low-income service work in the 'on-demand' economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898-914.
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, l. (2019). Networked but commodified: Toe (dis)embeddedness of digital labour in the gig economy. Sociology, 53(5), 931-950.