How to Cite
Giacomini, G. (2025). BEYOND COMMERCIAL PLATFORMS: THREE MODELS FOR DIGITAL POLITICS FROM THE GRASSROOTS. Soft Power, 11(22), 102–119. Retrieved from https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/7397
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Al enviar los artículos para su evaluación, los autores aceptan que transfieren los derechos de publicación a Soft Power. Revista Soft Power para su publicación en cualquier medio. Con el fin de aumentar su visibilidad, los documentos se envían a bases de datos y sistemas de indización, así mismo pueden ser consultados en la página web de la Revista.

Abstract

This article explores possibilities of digital participation which are autonomous from large commercial platforms. Firstly, it questions the democratic value of the current digital environment dominated by big tech in an era marked by individualism and depoliticization. Secondly, three models of democratic participation through alternative platforms in opposition to commercial ones are analysed. The first is the representative model, which seeks to innovate parties through technology. The second is the
participatory model, which emphasises the direct engagement of citizens through civic platforms. The third is the deliberative model, which proposes a decision-making process based on a representative random sample, which activates an inclusive deliberation process also using ICTs. In conclusion, the article discusses, through mental examples, the challenges of integrating these models into a system that responds to the current needs of democracy.

References

Ackerman, B. & Fishkin, J.S. (2005). Deliberation Day. Yale University Press.

Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. University ofCalifornia Press.

Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Sage.

Bennett, C.J. (2012). Privacy advocates, privacy advocacy and the surveillance society.

In K. Ball, K. Haggerty & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies.Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.ch4_2_c

Bonini, T. & Treré, E. (2024) Algorithms of Resistance. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14329.001.0001

Chadwick, A. (2007). Disintermediation. In M. Bevir (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Governance.Sage.

Coleman, S. & Blumler, J. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship. CambridgeUniversity Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818271

Crouch C. (2004). Post-democracy. Polity.

De Blasio, E. (2018). Il governo online. Carocci.

De Nadal, L. (2023). Populism and plebiscitarianism 2.0: How Podemos used digital platforms for organization and decision-making. New Media & Society, 25(11),2961-2980. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038763

Diamond, L., & Gunther, R. (2002). Political parties and democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801877841 Durkheim, E. (1893/2014). The division of labor in society. Simon and Schuster.

Eliasoph, N. (2011). Making volunteers: Civic life after welfare’s end. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147093.001.0001

Feenstra, R., Tormey, S., Casero-Ripollés, A., & Keane, J. (2017). Refiguring Democracy.The Spanish Political Laboratory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315160733

Fishkin, J.S. (1995). The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy, Yale University Press.

Garon, J.M. (2009). Reintermediation. International Journal of Private Law, 2(3), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2009.024140

Gerbaudo P. (2017). The Mask and the Flag. Hurst & Co.

Gerbaudo, P. (2018). The Digital Party. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv86dg2g

Giacomini, G. (2022). To be or not to be ‘Rousseauian’. The rise and fall of ‘digital utopianism’ in the Five Star Movement. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government,14(2), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i2.704

Giacomini, G. (2023). Disintermediation and/or Neointermediation?. Polish Sociological Review, 222(2), 249-262.

Gray-Hawkins, M. (2018). Collective movements, digital activism, and protest events. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 10(2), 64-69. https://doi. org/10.22381/GHIR10220188

Habermas, J. (1962/1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. The MIT Press.

Halperin, Y. (2022), Reclaiming the People. Counter-Populist Algorithmic Activism

on Israeli Facebook, Television & New Media, 24(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764211059462

Hosterman, A.R., Johnson, N.R., Stouffer, R., & Herring, S. (2018). Twitter, social support messages, and the #MeToo movement. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(2), 69-91.

Jackson, S.J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020), #HashtagActivism. Networks of Race and Gender Justice. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.

Lee, C. W. (2015). Do-it-yourself democracy: The rise of the public engagement industry. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199987269.001.0001

Magatti, M. (2012). La grande contrazione, Feltrinelli.

Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. Verso.

Mansell, R. (2016). Power, hierarchy and the internet. Global Studies Journal, 9(2), 19- 25. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-4432/CGP/v09i02/19-25

Martinez Sainz, G. & Hanna, A. (2023). Youth digital activism, social media and human rights education: the Fridays for Future movement, Human Rights Education Review, 6(1), 116-136. https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.4958n

Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state. Anthem Press.

Nez, H. (2012). Délibérer au sein d’un mouvement social: Ethnographie des assemblées des indignés à Madrid. Participations, 4(3), 79–102 https://doi.org/10.3917/parti.004.0079

Ohlheiser, A.W. (2020). How K-pop fans became celebrated online vigilantes. MIT Technology Review, 5 june.

Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on politics, 10(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711004877

Ruppert, E., Isin, E., & Bigo, D. (2017). Data Politics. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717717749

Slonecker, B. (2017). The Counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.392

Taylor-Gooby, P., & Leruth, B. (2018). Individualism and neoliberalism. In Attitudes, aspirations and welfare: Social policy directions in uncertain times. Springer, 29-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75783-4_2

Tronconi, F. (2015). Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement: Organisation, Communication and Ideology. Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315569062

Tufekci, Z. (2017), Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.

Way L. (2021), Analysing Politics and Protest in Digital Popular Culture. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529753158

Yang, G. (2016). Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter, Media and Communication, 4(4), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.692

Zimmermann, E. (2015). Social movements and political outcomes: why both ends fail to meet. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, 22(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2015.22.1.31

##submission.citations.for##

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |