POST-COLONIAL HISTORY, SUBALTERN STUDIES AND THE (DEFICITS OF) NEO-HEGELIAN CRITICAL THEORIST. ON AMY ALLEN’S DECOLONIZING PROJECT

Resumo

The paper takes its cue from Amy Allen’s critique of contemporary German critical theory from the perspective of post- and decolonial studies. It takes up the conceptions of history and progress adopted by Jürgen Habermas and, above all, Axel Honneth in light of the neo-Hegelian strategy of “normative reconstruction.” In doing so, it shows how this vision of the progressive development of “reason” in history establishes a hierarchy of eras and civilizations in favour of European modernity, a hierarchy strongly contested by subaltern studies. Against this background, the leading role played by subaltern groups, as highlighted in particular by Dipesh Chakrabarty, is emphasized. The discussion then shifts to the neo-Hegelian model of immanent critique from the perspective of the relationship between the critical theorist and the subaltern. Here, the paternalism and detachment of the traditional critical theorist are contrasted with the listening of the organic intellectual/critic, a theme addressed by Antonio Gramsci and taken up again in subaltern (and cultural) studies.

Referências

Allen, A. (2016). The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Columbia University Press.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.

Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.

Chakrabarty, D. (2002). Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies. University of Chicago Press.

Dussel, E. (1993). Eurocentrism and Modernity. Boundary 2, 20(3), 65–76.

Foucault, Michel (1980). Power/Knowledge. Harvester Press.

Foucault, Michel (1977), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Cornell University Press.

Gramsci, A. (1992). Some Problems in the Study of the Philosophy of Praxis. In A. Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds.). International Publishers.

Gramsci, A. (2000). Prison Notebooks. In The Gramsci Reader (D. Forgacs, Ed.). New York University Press.

Gramsci, A. (2021). Subaltern Social Groups (J. A. Buttigieg & M. E. Green, Eds.). Columbia University Press.

Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. MIT Press.

Hall, S. (1996). Gramsci’s relevance for the study of race and ethnicity. In S. Hall, Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies (D. Morley & K.-H. Chen Eds.), Routledge.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right (A. Wood, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (2001). The Philosophy of History. Batoche Books.

Honneth, A. (2007a). Pathologies of the Social. In A. Honneth, Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Polity Press.

Honneth, A. (2007b). The Possibility of a Disclosing Critique to Society. In A. Honneth, Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Polity Press.

Honneth, A. (2009a). A Social Pathology of Reason: On the Intellectual Legacy of Critical Theory. In A. Honneth, Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. Columbia University Press.

Honneth, A. (2009b). Reconstructive Social Criticism with a Genealogical Proviso. In A. Honneth, Pathologies of reason: On the legacy of critical theory. Columbia University Press.

Honneth, A. (2009c). Idiosyncrasy as a Tool of Knowledge: Social Criticism in the Age of the Normalized Intellectual”. In A. Honneth, Pathologies of reason: On the legacy of critical theory. Columbia University Press.

Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Polity Press.

Honneth, A. (2019). Recognition, Democracy and Social Liberty: A Reply. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45(6), 694–708.

Jaeggi, R. (2021). Rejoinder. Critical Horizons, 22(2), 197–200.

Jaeggi, R. (2025). Progress and Regression. Harvard University Press.

Marx, K. (1990). Preface to the First Edition. In K. Marx, Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1, B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin Books.

Mignolo, W. D. (2002). The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57–96.

Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloniality and the Grammar of De-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514.

Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Pptions. Duke University Press.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Said, E. W. (1989). Representing the Colonized: Anthropology’s Interlocutors. Critical Inquiry, 15(2), 205–225.

Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. Chatto & Windus.

Solinas, M. (2019a). Kritik der Regressionen. Politische, geschichtliche und psychosoziale Betrachtungen. Zeitschrift für kritische Theorie, 25(48/49), 145–166.

Solinas, M. (2019b). Immanent Teleologies Versus Historical Regressions: Some Political Remarks on Honneth’s Hegelianism. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45(6), 655–664.

Solinas, M. (2021). The Political Deficit of Immanent Critique: On Jaeggi’s Objections to Walzer’s Criticism. Critical Horizons, 22(2), 128–139.

Solinas, M. (2025). Goodbye Hegel! Overcoming “Geschichtsteleologie” in German Critical Theory. Critical Horizons, DOI: 10.1080/14409917.2025.2552644 (2025) in press.

Spivak, G. C. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard University Press.

Walzer, M. (1987). Interpretation and Social Criticism. Harvard University Press.